🎯

tailscale-docker-debug

🎯Skill

from rshade/agent-skills

What it does

A skill for diagnosing Tailscale connectivity and DNS failures inside Docker containers, detecting userspace vs kernel mode, DNS resolver conflicts, TUN interface issues, and multi-tailnet mismatches between host and container.

📦

Same repository

rshade/agent-skills(21 items)

tailscale-docker-debug

Installation

Vibe Index InstallInstalls to .claude/skills/

npx vibeindex add rshade/agent-skills --skill tailscale-docker-debug

skills.sh Install⚠ Installs to .agents/skills/

npx skills add rshade/agent-skills --skill tailscale-docker-debug

Manual InstallCopy SKILL.md content and save to the path below

~/.claude/skills/tailscale-docker-debug/SKILL.md

SKILL.md

70Installs

AddedMay 10, 2026

View on GitHub Back to Skills

More from this repository10

🎯

actionlint🎯Skill

Validates GitHub Actions workflow files for syntax errors, invalid references, expression mistakes, and security issues, catching errors before they waste CI minutes.

Skill

Skill

pull-request-msg-with-gh🎯Skill

Skill

🎯

design-principles🎯Skill

Skill

🎯

agent-ready-go🎯Skill

A collection of reusable skills for AI coding agents covering code quality (actionlint, commitlint, hadolint), Go development, workflow automation, security auditing, networking tools, and infrastructure cost analysis, distributed via skills.sh.

🎯

tailscale-install🎯Skill

A collection of reusable skills for AI coding agents covering code quality, Go development, networking, security, and infrastructure cost analysis. Each skill packages prerequisite checks, config detection, execution, and reporting into a complete workflow.

🎯

commitlint🎯Skill

An agent skill that validates commit messages against the Conventional Commits specification, catching malformed messages before they enter your git history. Useful when preparing pull requests or enforcing commit conventions across a team.

🎯

go-nolint-audit🎯Skill

Skill

🎯

decide🎯Skill

A three-agent adversarial debate skill (Red/Blue/White team) for strategic decisions, where two advocates steelman opposing positions while a moderator identifies risks, asks hard questions, and synthesizes a binding consensus document.